Risks

The AI security risks that matter, and what the evidence says

The main risks are manipulated tools, exposed data, tampered training data, over-trusted output and tools with too much access. The NCSC or OWASP documents each.

Last reviewed against NCSC, Department for Science, Innovation and Technology and OWASP GenAI Security Project. Sources

The core risks

Five to understand

Megaphone beside a padlock, shield, firewall, cloud and password field

Prompt injection

An attacker crafts input that steers a model away from what its owner intended. In the NCSC's words, prompt injection attacks are among the weaknesses reported most often in LLMs [2]. OWASP puts it first in its 2025 list [8]. See the prompt injection controls.

Businessman with empty pockets imagining stacks of coins and banknotes

Sensitive information disclosure

OWASP lists it second, as LLM02 [8]. A model, or the tools around it, can reveal confidential data in what it outputs.

Tangled green cable between a round badge and an arrow tip

Data poisoning

Here an attacker interferes with the material a model learns from, to bend its results, with consequences for security and bias [2]. The NCSC says the exposure rises as LLMs hand data on to third-party applications and services [2].

Sack marked FINE beside stacks of coins and a gavel

Unreliable output

The NCSC notes hallucinations, meaning confident but wrong answers, alongside bias [2]. OWASP separately lists improper output handling and misinformation [8].

Five software windows with bugs and a Computer Hacked warning

Excessive agency

OWASP lists excessive agency, where a tool is given more ability to act than it needs [8]. The NCSC says the impact grows when model output drives tools or APIs [1].

The wider picture

What the threat assessment says

The NCSC's assessment looking to 2027 sets out six judgements. Two stand out for a UK organisation. The first is that intrusion work will almost certainly get more efficient in places as attackers adopt AI. The second is that a divide will almost certainly open between systems that stay abreast of these threats and a large share that do not [4]. It also judges that expanding AI use, particularly in critical national infrastructure, almost certainly enlarges the attack surface [4].

Read the judgements as planning input

Where defences lag or stand still, the assessment allows that critical systems may become easier for advanced actors to compromise by 2027 [4].

Readiness

How prepared organisations are

The government survey puts a figure on the gap. Of businesses using or adopting AI, about a quarter (24%) had practices for managing AI-related cyber risk, against 27% of the charities in the same group [10]. Across all businesses, 43% reported a breach or attack in the 12 months before the survey [10].

The survey counts only incidents that organisations identified and chose to report, so the true rate is likely higher [10].

Next, turn the risks into action with the practical plan.

Use these checks to see where you stand:

  • Whether you can list every AI tool in use [3]
  • Whether each tool's data and action reach is known [3]
  • Whether someone is accountable for AI security [2]

Key facts

AI security controls in brief

Top LLM risk
Prompt injection, LLM01 in OWASP's 2025 list[8]
NCSC view
Prompt injection is a residual risk to manage, not a flaw to patch[1]
UK government code
Voluntary, 13 principles, published 31 January 2025[6]
Businesses using, adopting or considering AI
31%[10]
Of those using or adopting AI, with AI security practices
24% of businesses[10]
Agentic AI
NCSC: know what access agentic tools have to systems and data[3]

How CyPro can help

Need a hand planning for this?

Understanding the change is one job. Working out what it means for your systems, your suppliers and your roadmap is several more. CyPro's consultants can take any of them on.

Security lead advising a board

Fractional CISO for the board

A senior security lead who advises the board on what to fix first, what to accept and what to tell customers, and owns the decision record.

More on cypro.co.uk
Cyber security consultants planning hardening work

Hardening and segmentation

Our consultants put the controls in place that limit the damage when something is missed: firewall rules, network isolation and tighter admin access.

More on cypro.co.uk
Penetration tester probing an application for weaknesses

Penetration testing

A focused test of your systems and the controls around them, so you know they hold before an attacker finds out for you.

More on cypro.co.uk
Scanner checking internet-facing systems for weaknesses

Vulnerability scanning

Find every internet-facing system you run, including the forgotten ones, and see which are still on a vulnerable build.

See the scanning service
Security analysts monitoring systems around the clock

24/7 security monitoring

Our SOC analysts watch your systems day and night for the signs of an attack in progress: unexpected processes, new outbound connections, logins that do not fit.

More on cypro.co.uk
Incident responders containing an attack

Incident response

If you may already be compromised, our responders contain it, preserve the evidence, find out what was touched and get you running again safely.

More on cypro.co.uk
Rocket launching from a cloud

Plan ahead

Want a plan for your organisation?

AI security starts with knowing which tools are in use, who owns them and what they can reach. CyPro can help set the governance, accountability and controls around that.